[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704021534100.25602@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
cc: Dave Hansen <hansendc@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86_64: Switch to SPARSE_VIRTUAL
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> If it works I would be inclined to replaced old sparsemem with Christoph's
> new one on x86-64. Perhaps that could cut down the bewildering sparsemem
> ifdef jungle that is there currently.
>
> But I presume it won't work on 32bit because of the limited address space?
Not in general but it will work in non PAE mode. 4GB need 2^(32-21+4) =
16MB pages. This would require the mapping on 4 4MB pages.
For 64GB you'd need 256M which would be a quarter of low mem. Probably
takes up too much of low mem.
> > But, without some cold, hard, data, we mere mortals without the 1024-way
> > machines can only guess. ;)
>
> Yep.
>
> -Andi (who would be scared of a 1024 way x86 machine)
- Christoph (who does not believe that Andi has to wait long for
something bigger)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists