lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:41:01 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> To: Edgardo Hames <ehames@...il.com> cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Rebuilding and checksumming the Linux kernel On Apr 1 2007 22:03, Edgardo Hames wrote: >> code will or should always produce the same output. Compilers are not >> generally required to be deterministic. > > Could you please be a little more specific? We keep toolchains in our > SCM tool, Compile this, shush. #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { printf("%s %s\n", __DATE__, __TIME__); return 0; } Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists