[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070403123706.GX32597093@melbourne.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 22:37:06 +1000
From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To: xfs-masters@....sgi.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, reiserfs-dev@...esys.com
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: [PATCH] Cleanup and kernelify shrinker registration (rc5-mm2)
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 05:18:25PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 23:09 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This is not about efficiency. When have I *ever* posted optimization
> patches?
>
> This is about clarity. We have a standard convention for
> register/unregister. And they can't fail. Either of these would be
> sufficient to justify a change.
>
> Too many people doing cool new things in the kernel, not enough
> polishing of the crap that's already there 8(
>
> > But I think we need to weed that crappiness out of XFS first.
Can anyone else see the contradiction in these statements?
XFS's "crappiness" is a register/unregister interface. The only
reason it's being removed is because it's getting replaced with a
nearly identical register/unregister interface.
Just thought I'd point that out.... ;)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists