[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070403150042.GK14134@stusta.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 17:00:42 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntrae@...ibm.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mathiasen@...il.com
Subject: Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:26:52AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > On s390, it would be more than strangeness. There's no implementation
> > of PCI at all, someone would have to cook it up - and it wouldn't have
> > any use beyond those special devices. Since there isn't any bus type
> > that is available on *all* architectures, a generic "virtual" bus with
> > very simple probing seems much saner...
>
> You just have to change all the distribution installers then.
> Ok I suppose on s390 that's not that big issue because there are not
> that many for s390. But for x86 there exist quite a lot. I suppose
> it's easier to change it in the kernel.
I don't get this point.
Compared to whatever will be done in the kernel, any change to a
distribution installer should be trivial.
And a new release of a distribution with a new kernel might anyway
usually require some updates to an installer.
> -Andi
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists