linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20.4: NETDEV WATCHDOG and lockups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <75b66ecd0704030841r3783412doe27f3656169d7030@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:41:35 -0400
From:	"Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com>
To:	"Christian Kujau" <christian@...ouse.de>
Cc:	"Robert Hancock" <hancockr@...w.ca>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20.4: NETDEV WATCHDOG and lockups

On 4/3/07, Christian Kujau <christian@...ouse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > Although it's not as bad with servers, many machines are designed to run only
> > Windows (which normally always uses ACPI) and simply aren't tested well or at
> > all with ACPI disabled so you can run into a lot of problems which are just
> > bugs in the BIOS, etc.
>
> I only thought it was the other way around: less (active, used) code -
> less bug (caused by strange ACPI implementations). But I can see your
> point.
>

We have a bunch of servers here where Linux will only see one core per
processor unless ACPI is enabled.

Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/