[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830704030845p654cf8dh65ccdc46c92d3688@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:45:37 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, vatsa@...ibm.com,
akpm@...l.org, pj@....com, sekharan@...ibm.com, dev@...ru,
xemul@...ru, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
mbligh@...gle.com, winget@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem
On 4/3/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> But frankly I don't know where we stand right now wrt the containers
> patches. Do most people want to go with Vatsa's latest version moving
> containers into nsproxy? Has any other development been going on?
> Paul, have you made any updates?
I've not made major changes since the last patch post, just some small
optimizations and fixes - I've been too tied up with other stuff.
Whilst I've got no objection in general to using nsproxy rather than
the container_group object that I introduced in my latest patches, I
think that Vatsa's approach of losing the general container object is
flawed, since it loses any kind of per-group generic state (e.g. "this
container is being deleted") and last time I saw it, I think it would
tend to lose processes so that they didn't show up in any directory in
the container fs.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists