[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070403175101.GN2456@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:21:01 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: sekharan@...ibm.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...ru, rohitseth@...gle.com,
pj@....com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
mbligh@...gle.com, winget@...gle.com, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, dev@...ru, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:30:28AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> So how do you implement something like the /proc/<PID>/container info
> file in my patches?
I havent implemented that yet, so I will look at your next question:
> (Or more generally, tell which container a task is
> in for a given hierarchy?)
Why is the hierarchy bit important here? Usually controllers need to
know "tell me what cpuset this task belongs to", which is answered
by tsk->nsproxy->ctlr_data[CPUSET_ID].
The only usecase of storing hierarchy I have found is in container_clone()
where you need to create a directory in the right hierarchy, so knowing
the hierarchy to which a controller is bound becomes important.
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists