[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200704040831.35225.kernel@kolivas.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:31:34 +1000
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...glemail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm4
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 08:20, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Michal Piotrowski napisaĆ(a):
> > http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.21-rc5-mm4/m
> >m-oops
> > http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.21-rc5-mm4/m
> >m-config
>
> Sorry for a delay.
Never apologise!
(I'm trying hard to stay offline for my own health so I may have huge delays).
> Con, I think that your
> sched-implement-staircase-deadline-cpu-scheduler-staircase-improvements.pat
>ch is causing this oops.
Thanks for heads up!
Try this patch please?
---
Fix exiting recalc_task_prio without p->array being updated.
Microoptimisation courtesy of Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
---
kernel/sched.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm3/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm3.orig/kernel/sched.c 2007-04-04 08:23:45.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm3/kernel/sched.c 2007-04-04 08:25:39.000000000 +1000
@@ -683,11 +683,13 @@ static void dequeue_task(struct task_str
* The task is being queued on a fresh array so it has its entitlement
* bitmap cleared.
*/
-static inline void task_new_array(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
+static void task_new_array(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
+ struct prio_array *array)
{
bitmap_zero(p->bitmap, PRIO_RANGE);
p->rotation = rq->prio_rotation;
p->time_slice = p->quota;
+ p->array = array;
}
/* Find the first slot from the relevant prio_matrix entry */
@@ -736,11 +738,8 @@ static inline int next_entitled_slot(str
static void queue_expired(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
{
- p->array = rq->expired;
- task_new_array(p, rq);
+ task_new_array(p, rq, rq->expired);
p->prio = p->normal_prio = first_prio_slot(p);
- p->time_slice = p->quota;
- p->rotation = rq->prio_rotation;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -800,9 +799,9 @@ static void recalc_task_prio(struct task
queue_expired(p, rq);
return;
} else
- task_new_array(p, rq);
+ task_new_array(p, rq, array);
} else
- task_new_array(p, rq);
+ task_new_array(p, rq, array);
queue_prio = next_entitled_slot(p, rq);
if (queue_prio >= MAX_PRIO) {
--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists