[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200704040831.35225.kernel@kolivas.org>
Date:	Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:31:34 +1000
From:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
To:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Cc:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...glemail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm4
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 08:20, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Michal Piotrowski napisaĆ(a):
> > http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.21-rc5-mm4/m
> >m-oops
> > http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.21-rc5-mm4/m
> >m-config
>
> Sorry for a delay.
Never apologise! 
(I'm trying hard to stay offline for my own health so I may have huge delays).
> Con, I think that your
> sched-implement-staircase-deadline-cpu-scheduler-staircase-improvements.pat
>ch is causing this oops.
Thanks for heads up!
Try this patch please?
---
Fix exiting recalc_task_prio without p->array being updated.
Microoptimisation courtesy of Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm3/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm3.orig/kernel/sched.c	2007-04-04 08:23:45.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm3/kernel/sched.c	2007-04-04 08:25:39.000000000 +1000
@@ -683,11 +683,13 @@ static void dequeue_task(struct task_str
  * The task is being queued on a fresh array so it has its entitlement
  * bitmap cleared.
  */
-static inline void task_new_array(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
+static void task_new_array(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
+			   struct prio_array *array)
 {
 	bitmap_zero(p->bitmap, PRIO_RANGE);
 	p->rotation = rq->prio_rotation;
 	p->time_slice = p->quota;
+	p->array = array;
 }
 
 /* Find the first slot from the relevant prio_matrix entry */
@@ -736,11 +738,8 @@ static inline int next_entitled_slot(str
 
 static void queue_expired(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
 {
-	p->array = rq->expired;
-	task_new_array(p, rq);
+	task_new_array(p, rq, rq->expired);
 	p->prio = p->normal_prio = first_prio_slot(p);
-	p->time_slice = p->quota;
-	p->rotation = rq->prio_rotation;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -800,9 +799,9 @@ static void recalc_task_prio(struct task
 			queue_expired(p, rq);
 			return;
 		} else
-			task_new_array(p, rq);
+			task_new_array(p, rq, array);
 	} else
-		task_new_array(p, rq);
+		task_new_array(p, rq, array);
 
 	queue_prio = next_entitled_slot(p, rq);
 	if (queue_prio >= MAX_PRIO) {
-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
