linux-kernel - Re: getting processor numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4612E93D.2030909@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:54:37 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Subject: Re: getting processor numbers

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Does anyone see a reason why we cannot do this?

Shouldn't sched_setaffinity get the same treatment for symmetry reasons?

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (252 bytes)