[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1175575503.12230.484.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:45:02 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, xfs-masters@....sgi.com,
reiserfs-dev@...esys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup and kernelify shrinker registration (rc5-mm2)
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 20:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:44:45 +1000 Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> >
> > I can never remember what the function to register to receive VM pressure
> > is called. I have to trace down from __alloc_pages() to find it.
> >
> > It's called "set_shrinker()", and it needs Your Help.
> >
> > New version:
> > 1) Don't hide struct shrinker. It contains no magic.
> > 2) Don't allocate "struct shrinker". It's not helpful.
> > 3) Call them "register_shrinker" and "unregister_shrinker".
> > 4) Call the function "shrink" not "shrinker".
> > 5) Rename "nr_to_scan" argument to "nr_to_free".
>
> No, it is actually the number to scan. This is >= the number of freed
> objects.
>
> This is because, for better of for worse, the VM tries to balance the
> scanning rate of the various caches, not the reclaiming rate.
Err, ok, I completely missed that distinction.
Does that mean the to function correctly every user needs some internal
cursor so it doesn't end up scanning the first N entries over and over?
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists