[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070403074938.bc222b7e.khali@linux-fr.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:49:38 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Rudolf Marek <r.marek@...embler.cz>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:22:09 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 05:48:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > + u8 val;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > + acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(ACPI_MTX_INTERPRETER);
> > +#endif
> > outb(reg, data->addr + ADDR_REG_OFFSET);
> > - return inb(data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET);
> > + val = inb(data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > + acpi_ut_release_mutex(ACPI_MTX_INTERPRETER);
> > +#endif
> > + return val;
> > ... deletia, more of the same.
>
> it'd probably end up a lot cleaner to #define them to empty macros
> in the !ACPI case in acpi/acpi.h and just #include it unconditionally.
Sure, the implementation details can be refined later. I'm only trying
to see what can be done for now.
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists