[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070403060109.GA6708@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:01:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
linux list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: staircase deadline misc fixes
* Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> > Try two instances of chew.c at _differing_ nice levels on one cpu on
> > mainline, and then SD. This is why you can't renice X on mainline.
>
> How about something more challenging instead :)
>
> The numbers below are from my scheduler tree with massive_intr running
> at nice 0, and chew at nice 5. Below these numbers are 100 lines from
> the exact center of chew's output.
>
> (interactivity remains intact with this rather heavy load)
looks interesting - could you send the patch?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists