[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BAY20-F50719E454DCCF2309DA1AF9670@phx.gbl>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:11:28 +0000
From: "Paa Paa" <paapaa125@...mail.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Lower HD transfer rate with NCQ enabled?
I'm using Linux 2.6.20.4. I noticed that I get lower SATA hard drive
throughput with 2.6.20.4 than with 2.6.19. The reason was that 2.6.20
enables NCQ by defauly (queue_depth = 31/32 instead of 0/32). Transfer rate
was measured using "hdparm -t":
With NCQ (queue_depth == 31): 50MB/s.
Without NCQ (queue_depth == 0): 60MB/s.
20% difference is quite a lot. This is with Intel ICH8R controller and
Western Digital WD1600YS hard disk in AHCI mode. I also used the next
command to cat-copy a biggish (540MB) file and time it:
rm temp && sync && time sh -c 'cat quite_big_file > temp && sync'
Here I noticed no differences at all with and without NCQ. The times (real
time) were basically the same in many successive runs. Around 19s.
Q: What conclusion can I make on "hdparm -t" results or can I make any
conclusions? Do I really have lower performance with NCQ or not? If I do, is
this because of my HD or because of kernel?
Best regards,
Paapaa
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists