linux-kernel - Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200704031029.06819.borntrae@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:29:06 +0200
From:	Christian Borntraeger <borntrae@...ibm.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	mathiasen@...il.com
Subject: Re: A set of "standard" virtual devices?

On Monday 02 April 2007 23:12, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > How would that work in the case where virtualized guests don't have a
> > visible PCI bus, and the virtual environment doesn't pretend to emulate
> > a PCI bus?
> 
> If they emulated one with the appropiate device 
> then distribution driver auto probing would just work transparently for
> them. 

Still, that would only make sense for virtualized platforms that usually have 
a PCI bus. Thinking about seeing a PCI device on ,lets say, s390 is strange.

Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/