linux-kernel - Re: Poor UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:51:32 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	David Sperry <dave_sperry@...e.org>
Cc:	"'dave_sperry@...e.org'" <dasperry@...cast.net>,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt5


* David Sperry <dave_sperry@...e.org> wrote:

> > there are a few other things i'm working on to improve this. I've 
> > uploaded -rt9 which is the current state of affairs. Note that using 
> > -rt9 you'll likely only see IRQ-8406 overhead in the system, because 
> > i've added an optimization to do process the softirq-net-tx workload 
> > in the hardirq thread if the priority of the two is the same (which 
> > is the default behavior). But -rt9 is still work in progress that is 
> > not fully finished yet: in some cases i'm seeing 'fluctuating 
> > performance' problems on forcedeth that werent there before.
> 
> I tried -rt9 and saw some odd 'fluctuating performance'. I'll try it 
> again tomorrow when I am much closer to the box's power button.

could you try -rt10? I've improved hardirq/softirq threading performance 
some more, and have tuned the forcedeth driver too.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/