linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:46:32 +0200
From:	Éric Piel <Eric.Piel@...mplin-utc.net>
To:	Karl Pickett <karl.pickett@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

04/04/2007 02:34 AM, Karl Pickett wrote/a écrit:
> The ati_remote driver is a little too sensitive for my wife... if you
> do anything but barely tap the button you can get multiple events
> reported.  We prefer a more conservative no-repeat setting.  This is a
> pretty trivial patch which just makes one hard coded value soft
> configurable and does not change the default.
This default value is set to 300 ms. On my Xserver, the default value is 
660 ms and by default in my distrib it's set to 500 ms. So, indeed, the 
default value of the ati_remote is quite small. Maybe you could increase 
FILTER_MAX to 10 (= 600 ms) in order to have something saner?

That was my two cents :-)
See you,
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/