linux-kernel - Re: plain 2.6.21-rc5 (1) vs amanda (0)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:45:30 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Dave Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ray-gmail@...rabbit.org,
	amanda-hackers@...nda.org, amanda-users@...nda.org
Subject: Re: plain 2.6.21-rc5 (1) vs amanda (0)


* Dave Dillow <dave@...dillows.org> wrote:

> > Then it is a matter of figuring out why the device number changed -- 
> > I'm thinking it is device-mapper, but will look closer tomorrow.
> 
> This commit is the one that changed it:
> 
> commit fdf892be32d84a1745fa0aee5fc60517421b8038
> Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
> Date:   Mon Feb 12 00:51:44 2007 -0800
> 
>     [PATCH] register_blkdev(): don't hand out the LOCAL/EXPERIMENTAL majors
>     
>     As pointed out in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7922, 
>     dynamic blockdev major allocation can hand out majors which LANANA 
>     has defined as being for local/experimental use.

i dont think we should break backwards compatibility with a system that 
has not changed any hardware. Andrew, should we revert this?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/