[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:37:17 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Marko Macek <Marko.Macek@....net>
cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: missing madvise functionality
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Marko Macek wrote:
> Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > A solution for this problem is a madvise() operation with the following
> > property:
> >
> > - the content of the address range can be discarded
> >
> > - if an access to a page in the range happens in the future it must
> > succeed. The old page content can be provided or a new, empty page
> > can be provided
>
> Doesn't this conflict with disabling overcommit?
>
> If the page is guaranteed to be available, obviously it must count as
> being commited, so this is not equivalent to real freeing.
No, there's no conflict with disabled overcommit here: Committed_AS
accounting is done on the whole vma size (at mmap or brk time), no
matter how many pages may or may not be faulted in later. Rather
like RLIMIT_AS. The proposed madvise operation won't affect it.
(But I take Ulrich's "must succeed" with one pinch of salt:
Out-Of-Memory killing remains a possibility, of course.)
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists