[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070404114132.4d563267.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:41:32 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
ego@...ibm.com, paulmck@...ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vatsa@...ibm.com,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, dipankar@...ibm.com,
dino@...ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: utrace merge
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:36:24 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:06:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > urgh, I screwed up, sorry.
> > >
> > > utrace-prep-2 reverts a bit of the underlying tree so that the utrace
> > > patches (which are against mainline) don't throw a tremendous reject
> > > which has to be fixed each time I pull Roland's tree. I'm supposed to
> > > reapply that change after the utrace patches but forgot.
> >
> > btw., how about pushing utrace to v2.6.22, is anything big holding that
> > up? (other than Roland's modesty, which we should gently but firmly
> > ignore in this case =B-)
>
> a) lots of architecture support
> b) lots of overengineered and obsfucated code
> c) missing public information
>
> I've also not gotten any feedback to my ages old review and the issues
> don't seem to be addressed either.
>
And rmk had showstopper problems with ARM support which I never
saw resolved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists