[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:46:41 -0600
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@...fmountaingroup.com>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
CC: Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Latest e1000 7.3.20 driver busted with 2.6.20.4
Kok, Auke wrote:
> Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
>> CC [M] drivers/net/chelsio/mv88x201x.o
>> CC [M] drivers/net/chelsio/my3126.o
>> LD [M] drivers/net/chelsio/cxgb.o
>> CC drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.o
>> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c:1185:45: error: macro "INIT_WORK"
>> passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
>> ared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c:1184: error: (Each undeclared
>> identifier is reported only once
>> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c:1184: error: for each function it
>> appears in.)
>> make[3]: *** [drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.o] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/e1000] Error 2
>> make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
>> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>
>
> this is hardly a thread for lkml as you're posting about out
> out-of-tree driver. This issue has also been fixed in 7.4.35 which
> was released last week on e1000.sf.net. In the future, please post
> this stuff to e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net where we discuss the
> out-of-tree driver.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Auke
>
Thanks. I'll download Intel's latest driver and test it. I wasn't
discussing the out of tree driver (why do you have a broken Linux out of
tree driver, BTW? If its for Linux, shouldn't it be updated here
first) but the driver in 2.6.20.4 (which is missing support four
additional chipsets).
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists