linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:52:55 +0200
From:	"Vincent Vanackere" <vincent.vanackere@...il.com>
To:	"Karl Pickett" <karl.pickett@...il.com>
Cc:	Eric.Piel@...mplin-utc.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	inux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

On 4/4/07, Karl Pickett <karl.pickett@...il.com> wrote:
> Would this be more acceptable?  I haven't compiled or tested yet..but
> you can see what I'm trying to do.. make the delay time based instead
> of implementation/count based...

Well, I was going to submit a similar patch so I'd say that's the
right approach ;-)
(I just think the check on repeat_count < 5 must be kept as is
prevents the user to get the spurious events even if repeat_delay is
set too low).

I'm attaching a very small adaptation of your patch (re-added the
repeat_count check and a small comment, compile & run-time tested).
Works fine for me...

Best regards,

Vincent

View attachment "atiremote.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (2220 bytes)