[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 23:23:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] fix jiffies clocksource inittime
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> If so: worrisome. Startup ordering issues are fragile and tricky.
> Time management is fragile and tricky. The combination of the two
> doesn't get any better ;)
>
> An option would be to test it in 2.6.22-rcX for a while, then backport
> to 2.6.21.x.
is the v2.6.21 release so close? From all i can see Adrian Bunk still
has a very sizable regressions list, which necessiate a couple of weeks
to track down. And the delta since -rc5 is pretty large too,
necessiating an -rc6.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists