linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] Relocate VDSO ELF headers to match mapped location with COMPAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4614D580.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date:	Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:54:56 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To:	"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	"Roland McGrath" <roland@...hat.com>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
	"lkml" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Zachary Amsden" <zach@...are.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Relocate VDSO ELF headers to match
	mapped	location with COMPAT_VDSO

>+	for(; dyn->d_tag != DT_NULL; dyn++)
>+		switch(dyn->d_tag) {
>+		case DT_PLTGOT:
>+		case DT_HASH:
>+		case DT_STRTAB:
>+		case DT_SYMTAB:
>+		case DT_RELA:
>+		case DT_INIT:
>+		case DT_FINI:
>+		case DT_REL:
>+		case DT_DEBUG:
>+		case DT_JMPREL:
>+		case DT_VERSYM:
>+		case DT_VERDEF:
>+		case DT_VERNEED:
>+		case DT_ENCODING ... DT_HIOS:
>+			/* tags above DT_ENCODING are even if they're
>+			   a pointer, so skip odd ones */
>+			if (dyn->d_tag >= DT_ENCODING &&
>+			    (dyn->d_tag & 1) == 1)
>+				break;
>+
>+			dyn->d_un.d_ptr += VDSO_HIGH_BASE;
>+		}

I'm pretty certain the range OLD_DT_LOOS ... DT_LOOS must be excluded
here (the document version I'm looking at is inconsistent in itself here, saying
in one place to stop at DT_LOOS, in a second to stop at DT_HIOS, and in a
third to include DT_LOOS ... ST_HIOS - the inconsistency goes away if
assuming that the stop at DT_LOOS really means stop at OLD_DT_LOOS,
and the stop at DT_HIOS misses to special-case the OLD_DT_LOOS ...
DT_LOOS range.
Additionally I'm a little worried about excluding DT_ADDRRNGLO ...
DT_ADDRRNGHI in case future binutils ever start defaulting to generate
any of these (namely DT_GNU_HASH).

>+#define DT_ENCODING	32

Hmm, I was about to say this ought to be 31 when I realized the discrepancy
between document and binutils. I'll have to ask about this...

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/