linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/8] Use process freezer for cpu-hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:53:56 +0400
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ibm.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	vatsa@...ibm.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, mingo@...e.hu,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, dino@...ibm.com,
	masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] Use process freezer for cpu-hotplug

On 04/02, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>
> +	if (freeze_processes(FE_HOTPLUG_CPU)) {
> +		thaw_processes(FE_HOTPLUG_CPU);
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	}

Off-topic. This is a common pattern. Perhaps it makes sense to
introduce a try_to_freeze_or_thaw_and_return_an_error() helper.

> @@ -161,10 +141,13 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
>  					    hcpu) == NOTIFY_BAD)
>  			BUG();
>
> -		if (IS_ERR(p)) {
> +		set_cpus_allowed(current, old_allowed);
> +
> +		if (IS_ERR(p))
>  			err = PTR_ERR(p);
> -			goto out_allowed;
> -		}
> +		else
> +			err = kthread_stop(p);
> +
>  		goto out_thread;
>  	}

Why this change? We are doing kthread_stop() + set_cpus_allowed() on
return. Imho,

		if (IS_ERR(p))
			goto out_allowed;
		goto out_thread;

looks a bit better. Yes we need a couple of error labels at the end.

> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/kernel/softlockup.c
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/kernel/softlockup.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
>  	case CPU_DEAD:
>  		p = per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu);
>  		per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu) = NULL;
> +		thaw_process(p);
>  		kthread_stop(p);

As it was already discussed, this is racy. As Srivatsa (imho rightly)
suggested, kthread_stop(p) should thaw process itself. This also allows
us to kill at least some of wait_for_die loops.

However, the change in kthread_stop(p) in not enough to close the race.
We can check kthread_should_stop() in refrigerator(), this looks like
a most simple approach for now.

Alternatively, Srivatsa suggests to introduce a new task_lock() protected
task_struct->freezer_state (so we can reliably set FE_ALL). Surely this is
more poweful, but needs more changes. I am not sure. Perhaps we can do
this later.

In any case, imho "try3" should add thaw_process() to kthread_stop().
Gautham, Srivatsa, do you agree?

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/