[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1175772915.15973.125.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 04:35:15 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
johnstul@...ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: + clocksource-driver-initialize-list-value.patch added to -mm
tree
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 09:51 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
>
> > [...] Adding a list initializer doesn't change anything..
>
> Daniel, you are still in denial. OF COURSE it changes something: it adds
> a line of code to a driver, where that line was not needed before.
> That's against the fundamental task of a driver model: TO KEEP THINGS
> SIMPLE. Yes, this concept includes single-line changes as well.
If that's a fundemental rule then we need to expand our horizons to
something a little more flexible .. I understand what your saying, I do,
but it doesn't apply to this change or clocksources . The reason I think
that is because the potential is ~100 drivers or less, once you reach a
critical mass of drivers there's few if any to be added .. So from my
perspective there no reason to overly simplify the structure..
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists