linux-kernel - Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1175775877.7144.4.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date:	Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:24:37 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	linux list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest

On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> 
> > > re-testing the weak points of the vanilla scheduler + Mike's:
> > > 
> > >  - thud.c:    this workload has almost unnoticeable effect
> > >  - fiftyp.c:  noticeable, but alot better than previously!
> > 
> > Hmm.  Here fiftyp.c is utterly harmless.  If you have a second, can 
> > you send me a top snapshot?  If you're running many of them, it can 
> > take a bit for the throttle to catch them all.
> 
> ah, indeed - i ran 10 of them and letting them run for a bit smoothes 
> things out.

Ok, I didn't try 10 of them.  It can still get a bit ragged here, so I
may have to latch the throttle for a bit to make sure they have to
maintain improved behavior to get unleashed.  5 of them get instantly
nailed, and stay nailed.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/