| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:16:09 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com> To: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com> Cc: sekharan@...ibm.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...ru, rohitseth@...gle.com, pj@....com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, mbligh@...gle.com, winget@...gle.com, containers@...ts.osdl.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, dev@...ru, devel@...nvz.org Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:13:37AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > > ns should have a refcount of 1 to begin with. > > Right - that's my point, you're effectively passing the initial > refcount of the nsproxy to the container directory's d_fsdata > reference. sure .. > > Basically I am struggling to answer "How can a zero refcount (beancounter) > > object go non-zero when zero tasks are attached to it" .. > > In that case, I think you're fine. Your last posted patches didn't > provide a way to check for that, though, as far as I could see. Yes, the last patch I posted is very primitive considering all the discussions we had ..For ex: attach_task() in the last patch has more bugs [apart from the exit race I found recently with cpusets/containers] Each time I stopped and stared at attach_task() I could find a bug .. -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists