[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704051700240.3137@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:26:52 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Pat <patchu1@...oo.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Invalid operand: kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:434! and
arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:42!)
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Pat wrote:
> I'm running kernel 2.6.9-22.ELsmp on dual Xeon
You'd do better to ask Red Hat support than here.
> servers. I've received kernel panics occasionally in
> the past, but they are more frequent now as the load
> on the system has increased. Below is a capture of the
> kernel panic.
Are the initial BUGs usually of that kind - rmap.c:434?
(The subsequent scheduling-while-atomics and highmem.c:42s
are not interesting, just consequences of the original BUG
in an untidy place.)
> If anything below screams it's coming from a certain
> source (defective RAM? Bad application or device
> driver?), please let me know as I'm pulling what
> little hair I have left out on this one. Suggestions
> on what to try would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
I've never seen a BUG in page_add_anon_rmap before:
there's one in page_remove_rmap which comes up from time
to time, but this is different.
The page allocator has just dished out a PageReserved page
(at physical 1G+8k: interesting that it's so close to 1G),
which should never happen - but there was less checking
for that in 2.6.9-based kernels.
Do check your RAM (memtest86 overnight), maybe that
PG_reserved bit is spurious. But if rmap.c:434 is
what's happening to you again and again, I'd wonder
if a driver has been allocating a high-order page,
marking the constituent pages as reserved, later
clearing reserved from the first constituent page,
then freeing the high-order page while leaving other
reserved bits behind - I believe that could sneak a
PageReserved page back into the 2.6.9 allocator.
If it were a particular application triggering this,
it'd still be a kernel bug to allow it to happen.
Hugh
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:434!
> invalid operand: 0000 [#1]
> SMP
> Modules linked in: fusedriver(U) md5 ipv6 parport_pc
> lp parport autofs4 i2c_dev i2c_core sunrpc
> dm_multipath button battery ac uhci_hcd ehci_hcd e1000
> floppy dm_snapshot dm_zero dm_mirror ext3 jbd dm_mod
> 3w_9xxx(U) sd_mod scsi_mod
> CPU: 5
> EIP: 0060:[<c01518c6>] Not tainted VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010202 (2.6.9-22.ELsmp)
> EIP is at page_add_anon_rmap+0xe/0x66
> eax: 40000964 ebx: c1800040 ecx: 090a100c edx:
> e5b5a544
> esi: d1837e8c edi: fff25508 ebp: c1800040 esp:
> cf12ae40
> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Process check-enqueued- (pid: 17602,
> threadinfo=cf12a000 task=f57577b0)
> Stack: 40002067 80000000 c014d034 fff29000 40002025
> 80000000 00000163 e5b5a544
> f35b9080 00000000 fff25508 fff25508 090a100c
> c014d0e2 cc5a2240 00000001
> 090a100c ffffffff ffffffff 00000000 00000000
> 80000000 00000000 00000000
> Call Trace:
> [<c014d034>] do_anonymous_page+0x19c/0x1db
> [<c014d0e2>] do_no_page+0x6f/0x2f9
> [<c014d503>] handle_mm_fault+0xbd/0x175
> [<c011addb>] do_page_fault+0x1ae/0x5c6
> [<c014e58e>] vma_adjust+0x286/0x2d6
> [<c014e762>] vma_merge+0xe1/0x165
> [<c011d3d5>] finish_task_switch+0x30/0x66
> [<c02cf368>] schedule+0x844/0x87a
> [<c011ac2d>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x5c6
> [<c02d1bab>] error_code+0x2f/0x38
> Code: 83 7b 10 00 74 0b 89 ca 89 d8 e8 fb fe ff ff 01
> c6 89 d8 e8 ac df fe ff 5b 89 f0 5e c3 56 53 89 c3 8b
> 00 8b 72 44 f6 c4 08 74 08 <0f> 0b b2 01 ce 52 2e c0
> 85 f6 75 08 0f 0b b3 01 ce 52 2e c0 8b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists