[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070405154350.0ea203ea.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:43:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: root@...gramming.kicks-ass.net
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
miklos@...redi.hu, neilb@...e.de, dgc@....com,
tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
nikita@...sterfs.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] mm: fixup possible deadlock
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:42:17 +0200
root@...gramming.kicks-ass.net wrote:
> When the threshol is in the order of the per cpu inaccuracies we can
> deadlock by not receiveing the updated count,
That explanation is a bit, umm, terse.
> introduce a more expensive
> but more accurate stat read function to use on low thresholds.
Looks like percpu_counter_sum().
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists