[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1175743197.9371.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:19:57 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lguest32 kallsyms backtrace of guest.
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 12:54 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> This is a cool idea, but there are two issues with this patch. The
> first is that it's 500 lines of code: that's around +10% on lguest's
> total code size! The second is that it conflicts with the medium-term
> plan to allow any user to run up lguests: this is why lg.ko never
> printk()s about problems with the guest.
Not much I can do about the size, but it's in the debug section so
hopefully it's not considered too bad :)
>
> While it is useful for cases where a guest dies mysteriously before it
> brings up the console, three alternatives come to mind:
>
> 1) Modify early_printk so Guests can use it.
> 2) Have a separate tool(-set?) for this kind of post-mortem. Then you
> just have to implement guest suspend! 8)
> 3) Put this in a CONFIG_LGUEST_DEBUG.
>
> Note that options 1 or 2 make you do more work, but are probably better
> in the long term. I'm happy for #3 to sit as a patch in the tree for
> the duration, tho!
OK, I'll make a #3 patch to send, but the #1 looks best. Not to mention
that I still need to make it so that the console can read it.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists