linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20.3 AMD64 oops in CFQ code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <75b66ecd0704042113mebd1275w2fa40bf159416811@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:13:55 -0400
From:	"Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com>
To:	"Bill Davidsen" <davidsen@....com>
Cc:	"Tejun Heo" <teheo@...e.de>, linux@...izon.com,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, neilb@...e.de,
	cebbert@...hat.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...e.us,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20.3 AMD64 oops in CFQ code

On 4/4/07, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> wrote:
> I won't say that's voodoo, but if I ever did it I'd wipe down my
> keyboard with holy water afterward. ;-)
>
> Well, I did save the message in my tricks file, but it sounds like a
> last ditch effort after something get very wrong.

Would it reallty be an impediment to development if the kernel
maintainers simply refuse to merge patches that add new sysfs entries
without corresponding documentation?

Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/