[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070406104301.GB19755@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 05:43:01 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jack Steiner <steiner@...ricas.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
> So I think we have some options once we get the kernel threads out
> of the way. Getting the kernel threads out of the way would seem
> to be the first priority.
I think both avenues would probably be the right way to proceeed.
Getting kthreads to not be parented by init would be an opportunity
for optimization.
I think organizing the zombie tasks to be easily reaped also has merit.
Rapidly forking/exiting processes like udevd during the boot of a
different machine were also shown to benefit significantly from this
patch. That machine had 512 cpus and 4608 disk devices, we dropped the
device discovery under udevd by 30%. This, honestly, surprised us.
It makes some sense now that I think about it. This would be a case
where improving the zombie handling would be beneficial to more than
just kthreads.
Thanks,
Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists