lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461672D8.7090100@free.fr>
Date:	Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:18:32 +0200
From:	John <linux.kernel@...e.fr>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...esys.com, linux.kernel@...e.fr
Subject: 2.6.20-rt8 patch tweaked for 2.6.20.5

Hello,

I've tweaked patch-2.6.20-rt8 so that it applies to 2.6.20.5

The unified diff is attached to this message.

I'd be happy to hear comments on what I've done wrong.

78 hunks had to be offset and 3 hunks had to be fuzzed.

$ grep -B1 fuzz patch.log
patching file arch/ia64/kernel/iosapic.c
Hunk #3 succeeded at 469 with fuzz 2.
--
patching file kernel/fork.c
Hunk #9 succeeded at 975 with fuzz 1.
--
patching file kernel/sched.c
Hunk #46 succeeded at 3996 with fuzz 1.

What is the fuzz value, exactly?

Regards.


View attachment "2.6.20-to-2.6.20.5-diff" of type "text/plain" (3255 bytes)

View attachment "patch.log" of type "text/plain" (33154 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ