[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704061013060.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Oops. I misread stop_machine(), it does kernel_thread(), not kthread_create().
> So "stopmachine" threads are all re-parented to init when the caller exits.
> I think it makes sense to set ->exit_state = -1 in stopmachine(), regadless
> of any other changes.
I agree that "->exit_state = -1" makes sense, but I disagree in that I
don't think it *matters*.
Most of the problematic kernel threads are long-running (as in "never
exit"). Things like eventd, khelper, migration-threads etc will have init
as their parent and never actually exit, so their ->exit_state doesn't
matter. What matters is that they are on the children list, so when you
have 1024 CPU's, and init has many thousand of these per-cpu threads as
its children, then the *user* threads (that do exit) will cause problems!
I'd almost prefer to just not add kernel threads to any parent process
list *at*all*.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists