linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] FUTEX : new PRIVATE futexes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704061941220.6042@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:41:47 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
cc:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>,
	"Shai Fultheim (Shai@...lex86.org)" <shai@...lex86.org>,
	pravin b shelar <pravin.shelar@...softinc.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FUTEX : new PRIVATE futexes


On Apr 6 2007 07:05, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> 
>> I like |= for adding flags, it seems less ambiguous. But I guess that's
>> a matter of opinion. Hugh seems to like +=,
>
>Do I?  You probably have a shaming example in mind (PAGE_MAPPING_ANON?
>that's a hybrid case where using + and - helped minimize the casting);
>but in general I'd agree with you that it's |= for setting flag bits.
>
>Hmm, Eric's FUT_OFF_INODE is hybrid too, that might justify the +=

If a bit is already set, you can't set it again using +=.


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/