[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1wt0p5o1y.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:56:57 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@...ricas.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org> writes:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
>> Sure. It would be nice to move ->children into signal_struct at first.
>> Except this change breaks (in fact fixes) ->pdeath_signal behaviour.
>
> Ohhh, the "signal" struct! Funny name for something that nowadays has
> probably no more than a 5% affinity with signal-related tasks :/
Hmm. I wonder if we should just rename it the struct thread_group,
or struct task_group. Those seem slightly more accurate names.
I remember last time the conversation about renaming it came up no
one had a good name for it that wasn't already taken.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists