[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070406194329.GB21322@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 21:43:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> wrote:
> > I'd almost prefer to just not add kernel threads to any parent
> > process list *at*all*.
>
> Yes sure, I didn't argue with that. However, "->exit_state = -1" does
> matter, we can't detach process unless we make it auto-reap.
> Off course, we also need to add preparent_to_init() to kthread() and
> (say) stopmachine(). Or we can create kernel_thread_detached() and
> modify callers to use it.
this isnt a kernel-thread special case. The right solution IMO is to
first migrate wait4()'s ->children use over to a new p->exiting_children
list and then to gradually get rid of all remaining uses of p->children.
(the first patch of which i sent a few minutes ago)
that way wait4() will be sped up, and quite dramatically i believe. No
need to deal with kthreads here at all - those just wont ever show up in
the ->exiting_children list. Am i missing something?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists