[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704061427130.8738@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@...ricas.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org> wrote:
>
> > > > Ohhh, the "signal" struct! Funny name for something that nowadays
> > > > has probably no more than a 5% affinity with signal-related tasks
> > > > :/
> > >
> > > Hmm. I wonder if we should just rename it the struct thread_group,
> > > or struct task_group. Those seem slightly more accurate names.
> >
> > Almost *anything* is better than "signal_struct" ;) A task_group could
> > be fine, so something on the line of task_shared_ctx.
>
> or lets just face it and name it what it is: process_struct ;-)
That'd be fine too! Wonder if Linus would swallow a rename patch like
that...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists