linux-kernel - Re: coding style for long conditions (WAS: Re: [PATCH 25/90] ... blinky leds!!)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200704061540.34500.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:40:34 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: coding style for long conditions (WAS: Re: [PATCH 25/90] ... blinky leds!!)

On Friday 06 April 2007 3:04 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> >	if (...) {
> >		THAT WAS ONE MORE TAB
> >	}
> >
> >and
> >
> >	for (...) {
> >		THAT WAS ALSO ONE MORE TAB
> >	}
> >
> >Come on, stop wasting everyone's time with utter nonsense.
> 
> I was never debating these two things. 

Actually, you did.  Go back and see the point I was specifically
disagreeing with.  It related to the body of the "if" block,
which you had said would **NOT** indent by a single tab.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/