[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070406162233.b835bd4c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:22:33 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 18/20] clean up tsc-based sched_clock
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:12:09 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Three cleanups:
> - change "instable" -> "unstable"
> - its better to use get_cpu_var for getting this cpu's variables
> - change cycles_2_ns to do the full computation rather than just the
> tsc->ns scaling. Its a simpler interface, and it makes the function
> more generally useful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>
>
> ---
> arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
I'm dropping the relevant patch from Andi's tree due to it causing
mysterious hangs when initscripts start ondemand. So I'll need to drop
this patch and "[patch 19/20] Add a sched_clock paravirt_op".
I still need to work out why that hang is happening - it is very
mysterious. I got as far as working out that it was hanging on
write_seqlock_irqsave(xtime_lock), then remembered that it's with
CONFIG_SMP=n so I stomped off to bed in disgust. Later.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists