[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704060644150.4723@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 07:05:22 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>,
"Shai Fultheim (Shai@...lex86.org)" <shai@...lex86.org>,
pravin b shelar <pravin.shelar@...softinc.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FUTEX : new PRIVATE futexes
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> I like |= for adding flags, it seems less ambiguous. But I guess that's
> a matter of opinion. Hugh seems to like +=,
Do I? You probably have a shaming example in mind (PAGE_MAPPING_ANON?
that's a hybrid case where using + and - helped minimize the casting);
but in general I'd agree with you that it's |= for setting flag bits.
Hmm, Eric's FUT_OFF_INODE is hybrid too, that might justify the +=
> and I can't argue with him about style issues ;)
I feel a warm glow. Nobody ever called me a style guru before.
Hugh
p.s. Please don't interpret this as any useful contribution to
reviewing Eric's futex work: seems sensible, but I've hardly looked.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists