linux-kernel - Re: Oops in scsi_send_eh_cmnd 2.6.21-rc5-git6,7,10,13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070405.171506.125894469.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	James.Bottomley@...elEye.com
Cc:	aab@...hlid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oops in scsi_send_eh_cmnd 2.6.21-rc5-git6,7,10,13

From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:02:19 -0500

> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 15:36 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Andrew Burgess <aab@...hlid.com>
> > Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:13:27 -0700
> > 
> > > David, do you see any other problems with scsi_send_eh_cmnd?
> > > 
> > > I've switched back to 2.6.18 which seems to not oops 
> > > and am happy to try patches.
> > 
> > Does 2.6.20 with my patch OOPS too?  Does reverting my patch
> > make the oops go away?
> > 
> > If reverting my patch makes the OOPS go away, we need to
> > verify if page_address() is returning crap for some reason
> > or the length is wrong.
> 
> Assuming this does turn out to be the problem, we should just junk the
> page allocation ... it's completely unnecessary; when the slab allocated
> commands were done, we made sure the actual sense_buffer is at the
> correct location, so this should be the final fix:

This won't work I believe.

There are cases that use smaller sense buffers than the minimum
specified by the SCSI layer.

One example is that do_sr_ioctl() stuff when the cgc passed
in has a sense buffer.  That will only be as large as a
"struct request_sense".

I'm pretty sure that's one of the reasons why we cons up a local sense
buffer in this EH code.

So we could walk past the end of that and corrupt memory with
your patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/