[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070406090822.GA2425@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:08:22 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: preemption and rwsems (was: Re: missing madvise functionality)
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > getting a good trace of it is easy: pick up the latest -rt kernel
> > from:
> >
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
> >
> > enable EVENT_TRACING in that kernel, run the workload and do:
> >
> > scripts/trace-it > to-ingo.txt
> >
> > and send me the output.
>
> Did that - no output was generated. config at
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-akpm2.txt
sorry, i forgot to mention that you should turn off
CONFIG_WAKEUP_TIMING.
i've attached an updated version of trace-it.c, which will turn this off
itself, using a sysctl. I also made WAKEUP_TIMING default-off.
> I did get an interesting dmesg spew:
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-akpm2.txt
yeah, it's stack footprint measurement/instrumentation. It's
particularly effective at tracking the worst-case stack footprint if you
have FUNCTION_TRACING enabled - because in that case the kernel measures
the stack's size at every function entry point. It does a maximum search
so after bootup (in search of the 'largest' stack frame) so it's a bit
verbose, but gets alot rarer later on. If it bothers you then disable:
CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW=y
it could interfere with getting a quality scheduling trace anyway.
Ingo
View attachment "trace-it.c" of type "text/plain" (2735 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists