[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461939A4.2020305@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:51:16 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: Ten percent test
On 04/08/2007 12:41 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> this is pretty hard to get right, and the most objective way to change
> it is to do it testcase-driven. FYI, interactivity tweaking has been
> gradual, the last bigger round of interactivity changes were done a year
> ago:
>
> commit 5ce74abe788a26698876e66b9c9ce7e7acc25413
> Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Date: Mon Apr 10 22:52:44 2006 -0700
>
> [PATCH] sched: fix interactive task starvation
>
> (and a few smaller tweaks since then too.)
>
> and that change from Mike responded to a testcase. Mike's latest changes
> (the ones you just tested) were mostly driven by actual testcases too,
> which measured long-term timeslice distribution fairness.
Ah yes, that one. Here's the next one in that series:
commit f1adad78dd2fc8edaa513e0bde92b4c64340245c
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...osdl.org>
Date: Sun May 21 18:54:09 2006 -0700
Revert "[PATCH] sched: fix interactive task starvation"
It personally had me wonder if _anyone_ was testing this stuff...
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists