lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1176047840.9587.9.camel@localhost>
Date:	Sun, 08 Apr 2007 17:57:20 +0200
From:	Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc6 - regressions update

On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 16:04 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

[HPET issues resolved]
> > 3) Subject    : SATA breakage on resume
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/7/233
> > Submitter  : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >              Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de>
> > Status     : unknown
> > 
> > I am still seeing these messages after a suspend/resume cycle (though
> > all devices work even after multiple suspend/resume cycles)
> > 
> > ATA: abnormal status 0x80 on port 0x000140df
> 
> This seems to be normal, and related to some unknown timing issue. If the 
> thing works for you apart from the message, I'd just ignore it..

Argh! Now after intensive use over the last 2 days, I realized that the
internal harddisk works OK, but the dvd-drive did not after the 7th
suspend/resume cycle - the device was suddenly gone (I could not even
eject the disc I just inserted), more verbose dmesg follows:

ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient (Status 0x80)
ata1: port failed to respond (30 secs, Status 0x80)
ATA: abnormal status 0x80 on port 0x000101f7
ATA: abnormal status 0x80 on port 0x000101f7
ATA: abnormal status 0x80 on port 0x000101f7
ATA: abnormal status 0x80 on port 0x000101f7
ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xa1)
ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)
ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
ata1: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs
ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient (Status 0x80)
ata1: port failed to respond (30 secs, Status 0x80)
ATA: abnormal status 0x80 on port 0x000101f7
ATA: abnormal status 0x80 on port 0x000101f7
ATA: abnormal status 0x80 on port 0x000101f7
ATA: abnormal status 0x80 on port 0x000101f7
ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xa1)
ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)
ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
ata1.00: limiting speed to UDMA/33:PIO3
ata1: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs
ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient (Status 0x80)
ata1: port failed to respond (30 secs, Status 0x80)
ATA: abnormal status 0x80 on port 0x000101f7
sage repeated 4 times
ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xa1)
ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)
ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
ata1.00: disabled

Soeren
-- 
For the one fact about the future of which we can be certain is that it
will be utterly fantastic. -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1962
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ