linux-kernel - Re: If not readdir() then what?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1176121769.6210.5.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:29:29 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To:	Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: If not readdir() then what?

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 13:09 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> That surely doesn't make life any easier for filesystem developers, I
> agree.  From that point of view, all telldir cookies should end their
> life at closedir time.  For "rm -r" it would be sufficient if the nfs
> client simply didn't seekdir at all.  For "ls -lR", this would return
> duplicate dentries.

Please go read the NFS spec. The only thing an NFS client has in order
to read a directory is a READDIR operation that in essence takes a
filehandle and a cookie as its arguments. Unless the server is able to
return the entire directory in one RPC reply, the client That is a
protocol limitation, not a client limitation.

Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/