[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17946.14646.808334.441833@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:01:42 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, suparna@...ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: Interface for the new fallocate() system call
Jörn Engel writes:
> Wouldn't that work be confined to fallocate()? If I understand Heiko
> correctly, the alternative would slow s390 down for every syscall,
> including more performance-critical ones.
The alternative that Jakub suggested wouldn't slow s390 down.
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists