[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461A6CEA.8090400@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:42:18 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
CC: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.20.6
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
>> We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.20.6 kernel.
>> This has 2 important fixes that should have been in 2.6.20.5. They are
>> issues that were pointed with 2.6.20.5 patches during its review cycle,
>> but the patch updates were mistakenly dropped. Please accept our
>> apologies for the mistake.
>>
>> The diffstat and short summary of the fixes are below.
>>
>> I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between
>> 2.6.20.5 and 2.6.20.6.
>>
>> The updated 2.6.20.y git tree can be found at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.20.y.git
>> and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web browser:
>> www.kernel.org/git/
>>
>
> That tree is not up-to-date. So much for using it to track -stable --
> what should I use instead?
It is the stable-queue tree that's not up-to-date:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
Apparently updates stopped three days ago...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists