[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4619B202.3050601@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:24:50 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Distribution installers usually try to probe OSes for building a suited
> grub menu. Unfortunately, mounting an ext3 partition, even in read-only
> mode, does perform some operations on the filesystem (log recovery).
> This is not a good idea since it may silently garbage data.
Can you elaborate? Under what circumstances is log replay going to harm
data? Do you mean that the installer mounts partitions, looking for
what OS is installed? How is that harmful?
Ohhh... this is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=417407
isn't it?
Hm, so the root cause there seems that the installer found 2 legs of a
mirror and mounted them independently, recovering them independently...
But why did that cause problems?
> XFS has a
> norecovery option that allows to disable that, I'd say ext3/4 should
> have it too.
The xfs mount option is useful on a purely read-only device, or if the
log is corrupted to the point where it can't be replayed... It was put
in place 9+ years ago. :) I'd have to ask the sgi guys to dig & see
what the original use for...
It'd be easy enough to add to ext3/4, I suppose. Other options you may
have in the installer, though, is to check for md superblocks before
mounting bare partitions, or maybe use the BLKROSET ioctl to set the
block device to read-only prior to mount, for added insurance...
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists