[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461A816F.4050507@tmr.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:09:51 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@...ricas.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>>> or lets just face it and name it what it is: process_struct ;-)
>>> That'd be fine too! Wonder if Linus would swallow a rename patch like
>>> that...
>> I don't really see the point. It's not even *true*. A "process"
>> includes more than the shared signal-handling - it would include files
>> and fs etc too.
>>
>> So it's actually *more* correct to call it the shared signal state
>> than it would be to call it "process" state.
>
> we could call it "structure for everything that we know to be ugly about
> POSIX process semantics" ;-) The rest, like files and fs we've
> abstracted out already.
>
> Ingo
So are you voting for ugly_struct? ;-)
I do think this is still waiting for a more descriptive name, like
proc_misc_struct or some such. Kernel code should be treated as
literature, intended to be both read and readable.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists